Newsroom
Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation
Farrar, et al. v Mobil Oil Corporation, Stevens County, Kansas, Case No. 01 CV 12
Click here for Case Profile Page
← Older posts | Newer posts →Plaintiffs’ Response to Mobil’s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
Plaintiffs asked the Court to deny Mobil’s motion for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
Mobil’s Motion For Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
Mobil filed this motion asking the Court to grant an extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion for SummaryJudgment on Their Claim for Breach of the 1984 Settlement Agreement.
Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Their Claim for Defendant’s Breach of the 1984 Settlement Agreement
Plaintiffs submitted this Memorandum in support of their summary judgment motion against Mobil, on their claim that Mobil breached the 1984 Settlement Agreement.
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Their Claim for Defendant’s Breach of the 1984 Settlement Agreement
Plaintiff Class Counsel requested that the Court enter an order of summary judgment in their favor on their claim that Mobil breached the 1984 Settlement Agreement previously entered into by the parties.
Second Supplemental Order on Notice to Class Members
In January 2011, Mobil provided to Plaintiff Class Counsel a list of additional members of the Plaintiff Class. In this Second Supplemental Order, the Court set the date on which notices were to be mailed to those additional Class Members.
Notice of Class Action
This is the official Notice of a class action that was sent to the members of the Plaintiff Class.
Supplemental Order on Notice To Class Members
Plaintiff’s requested this Supplemental Order from the Court in order to update the notices that are to be mailed to members of the Plaintiff Class and published.
Order denying Petition for Review
On November 5, 2010, the Kansas Supreme Court denied Mobil’s Petition for Review. The lawsuit is now back in district court for further proceedings. Order denying Petition for Review (PDF)
Mobil’s Response To Appellees’ Motion Regarding Stay
Mobil’s response to Appellees’ Motion regarding continuing effect of stay order.
Appellees’ Motion For An Order Confirming Stay…
Appellees’ Motion For An Order Confirming Stay Is No Longer In Effect Or, In The Alternative, For An Order Vacating The Stay
← Older posts | Newer posts →
