Newsroom
Spieker et al. v. PostRock Midcontinent Production, LLC, successor by merger to Quest Cherokee, LLC
Spieker et al. v. PostRock Midcontinent Production, LLC, successor by merger to Quest Cherokee, LLC, United States District Court for the District of Kansas, Case No. 07-CV-1225-EFM
← Older posts | Newer posts →Order – granting Joint Motion
On November 29, 2011, the Court entered an Order granting the parties’ Joint Motion.
Joint Motion
On November 29, 2011, the parties filed a Joint Motion requesting the Court to enter an order granting plaintiffs leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, conditionally certify a Settlement Class, preliminarily approve the Settlement Agreement, approve a form of Notice for mailing and publiction, … Continue reading
Settlement Agreement
The parties executed the Settlement Agreement on November 25, 2011.
Order – granting Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion to Compel
On July 21, 2009, the Court entered an Order granting Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion to Compel regarding the production of Quest’s electronically-stored information.
Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Renewed Motion to Compel
On February 13, 2009, plaintiffs filed a Reply in response to Quest’s opposition to the production of its electronically-stored information.
Response to Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion to Compel
On January 23, 2009, Quest filed its Response in opposition to Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion to Compel concerning the production of its electronically-stored information.
Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion to Compel
On December 19, 2008, plaintiffs renewed their Motion to Compel again asking the Court to issue an order compelling Quest to produce its electronically-stored information.
Order – denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel
On October 30, 2008, the Court entered an Order denying plaintiffs’ initial Motion to Compel.
Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel
On August 1, 2008, plaintiffs’ filed a Reply to Quest’s response in opposition to plaintiffs’ motion regarding the production of its electronically-stored information.
Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel
On July 18, 2008, Quest filed its Response in opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel regarding the production of its electronically-stored information.
← Older posts | Newer posts →
