Newsroom

Spieker et al. v. PostRock Midcontinent Production, LLC, successor by merger to Quest Cherokee, LLC


Spieker et al. v. PostRock Midcontinent Production, LLC, successor by merger to Quest Cherokee, LLC, United States District Court for the District of Kansas, Case No. 07-CV-1225-EFM

Click here for Case Profile

← Older posts | Newer posts →

PostRock’s Motion to Approve Administrative Expenses

PostRock filed its motion asking the court to approve payment of its administrative expenses.

Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint

In accordance with the Settlement Agreement, Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint reflects the defendant’s change of name, and also expands the claims asserted to include additional matters (waste oil and conservation fees) that were addressed in the settlement negotiations.

Order – granting Joint Motion

On November 29, 2011, the Court entered an Order granting the parties’ Joint Motion.

Joint Motion

On November 29, 2011, the parties filed a Joint Motion requesting the Court to enter an order granting plaintiffs leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, conditionally certify a Settlement Class, preliminarily approve the Settlement Agreement, approve a form of Notice for mailing and publiction, … Continue reading

Settlement Agreement

The parties executed the Settlement Agreement on November 25, 2011.

Order – granting Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion to Compel

On July 21, 2009, the Court entered an Order granting Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion to Compel regarding the production of Quest’s electronically-stored information.

Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Renewed Motion to Compel

On February 13, 2009, plaintiffs filed a Reply in response to Quest’s opposition to the production of its electronically-stored information.

Response to Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion to Compel

On January 23, 2009, Quest filed its Response in opposition to Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion to Compel concerning the production of its electronically-stored information.

Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion to Compel

On December 19, 2008, plaintiffs renewed their Motion to Compel again asking the Court to issue an order compelling Quest to produce its electronically-stored information.

Order – denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel

On October 30, 2008, the Court entered an Order denying plaintiffs’ initial Motion to Compel.

← Older posts | Newer posts →