by RSM Marketing | Mar 22, 2012 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation
Mobil appealed from the Court’s adverse ruling regarding its breach of the 1984 Settlement Agreement.by RSM Marketing | Mar 15, 2012 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation
On March 15, 2012, the Court entered an Order granting plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment on their claim that Mobil breached the 1984 Settlement Agreement.by RSM Marketing | Aug 19, 2011 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation
The Court entered a Case Management Order which establishes certain timetables for pretrial matters, and sets a trial date on October 29, 2012.by RSM Marketing | Jul 21, 2011 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation
Plaintiffs ask the Court for an order determining that the prior rulings made by Hon. Tom R. Smith on August 18, 2009, and affirmed by the Kansas Court of Appeals, constitute the law of the case.by RSM Marketing | Jul 21, 2011 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation
Plaintiffs’ submitted this Memorandum in support of their motion for an order determining that the prior rulings of Hon. Tom R. Smith on August 18, 2009, and affirmed by the Kansas Court of Appeals, constitute the law of the case.by RSM Marketing | Jun 28, 2011 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation
The court granted Mobil 90 days to conduct discovery and respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment.