by RSM Marketing | Dec 19, 2008 | Spieker et al. v. PostRock Midcontinent Production, LLC, successor by merger to Quest Cherokee, LLC
On December 19, 2008, plaintiffs renewed their Motion to Compel again asking the Court to issue an order compelling Quest to produce its electronically-stored information.by RSM Marketing | Oct 30, 2008 | Spieker et al. v. PostRock Midcontinent Production, LLC, successor by merger to Quest Cherokee, LLC
On October 30, 2008, the Court entered an Order denying plaintiffs’ initial Motion to Compel.by RSM Marketing | Aug 1, 2008 | Spieker et al. v. PostRock Midcontinent Production, LLC, successor by merger to Quest Cherokee, LLC
On August 1, 2008, plaintiffs’ filed a Reply to Quest’s response in opposition to plaintiffs’ motion regarding the production of its electronically-stored information.by RSM Marketing | Jul 18, 2008 | Spieker et al. v. PostRock Midcontinent Production, LLC, successor by merger to Quest Cherokee, LLC
On July 18, 2008, Quest filed its Response in opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel regarding the production of its electronically-stored information.by RSM Marketing | Jun 20, 2008 | Spieker et al. v. PostRock Midcontinent Production, LLC, successor by merger to Quest Cherokee, LLC
On June 20, 2008, plaintiffs filed a Motion to Compel asking the Court for an order compelling Quest to produce its electronically-stored information.by RSM Marketing | Oct 4, 2007 | Spieker et al. v. PostRock Midcontinent Production, LLC, successor by merger to Quest Cherokee, LLC
Quest filed its Answer to Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint on October 4, 2007.