by RSM Marketing | Mar 30, 2011 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation
Plaintiffs submitted this Memorandum in support of their summary judgment motion against Mobil, on their claim that Mobil breached the 1984 Settlement Agreement.by RSM Marketing | Mar 30, 2011 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation
Plaintiff Class Counsel requested that the Court enter an order of summary judgment in their favor on their claim that Mobil breached the 1984 Settlement Agreement previously entered into by the parties.by RSM Marketing | Feb 8, 2011 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation
In January 2011, Mobil provided to Plaintiff Class Counsel a list of additional members of the Plaintiff Class. In this Second Supplemental Order, the Court set the date on which notices were to be mailed to those additional Class Members.by RSM Marketing | Dec 16, 2010 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation
This is the official Notice of a class action that was sent to the members of the Plaintiff Class.by RSM Marketing | Dec 16, 2010 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation
Plaintiff’s requested this Supplemental Order from the Court in order to update the notices that are to be mailed to members of the Plaintiff Class and published.by RSM Marketing | Nov 5, 2010 | Farrar et al. v. Mobil Oil Corporation
On November 5, 2010, the Kansas Supreme Court denied Mobil’s Petition for Review. The lawsuit is now back in district court for further proceedings. Order denying Petition for Review (PDF)